#TheClassicsEight: A Cat Among the Pigeons by Agatha Christie

A Cat Among the Pigeons

About the Book:

Unpleasant things are going on in an exclusive school for girls – things like murder…

Late one night, two teachers investigate a mysterious flashing light in the sports pavilion, while the rest of the school sleeps. There, among the lacrosse sticks, they stumble upon the body of the unpopular games mistress – shot through the heart from point blank range. The school is thrown into chaos when the ‘cat’ strikes again. Unfortunately, schoolgirl Julia Upjohn knows too much. In particular, she knows that without Hercule Poirot’s help, she will be the next victim…


My Thoughts:

This is my first Agatha Christie and while I can’t deny it was an entertaining read, if I didn’t have a special Folio edition of Murder on the Orient Express, it would likely also be my last. This book has not dated well, from two perspectives. The first concerns Christie herself. Not only was this book filled with derogatory references toward Black, Asian, Italian, French Native American and Arab peoples, it also contained distasteful passages about Jews and Catholics. All of her characters use racial epithets in normal conversation, repeatedly. Now, I do understand that when you read these older ‘classic’ titles, you do need to allow for changing conventions and the differing mores of the eras, but even accounting for this, Christie was unbelievably pro-British Empire in a very white supremacist kind of way, and this translates over and into her characters, dishing up racism and intolerance in layers. It’s quite nauseating.

The other aspect in which this book doesn’t date well is more to do with language convention. Again, times have changed and so has the way we speak, but there seemed to be this innuendo running through the novel, and to have listed all of the examples might have led to this review being flagged as containing offensive material! However, to give you an idea:

‘How’d you like to penetrate into a girls’ school?’ he asked.

~~~
‘Nom d’un nom d’un nom!’ ejaculated Poirot in an awe-inspired whisper.

Is this really the way that people in the 1950s spoke? There was also a section in which one of the characters says that she has a ‘big pussy installed’ in her unwell mother’s house to care for her whenever she is not there. I can’t even go there, sorry. Is she talking about a nurse, a housekeeper? Have they ever been called that? Or is it a service cat? It all seems a little beyond the pale, to be honest.

As I mentioned initially, the story was entertaining in terms of a murder mystery and the sophistication of the plot. It’s billed as a Poirot novel, but the great man himself doesn’t even make an appearance until over two-thirds of the way through. Perhaps this is normal for Poirot novels. He is enlisted to help, does some preliminary investigations with the remainder of his case being worked off-page. Then he gathers everyone in the same room, presents his findings in a way that tricks the guilty party into making a confession, and then the case is closed. To me, it seemed as though Christie spent all this time building a cracker mystery only to have Poirot explain her plot at the very end as a means of wrapping everything up quickly and neatly.

‘You seem to have explanations for everything, Mr Poirot.’
‘That’s his speciality,’ said Inspector Kelsey with slight malice.

At least no one can gasp in astonishment that I’ve never read a Christie anymore. Can’t say it’s enriched my life now that I have! However, I needed to read a classic I’ve never read before for my last bingo category and this fit the bill nicely.

☕☕☕


Cat Among the Pigeons
First Published in 1959

13 thoughts on “#TheClassicsEight: A Cat Among the Pigeons by Agatha Christie

  1. I still haven’t read any Christie, and your review doesn’t encourage me to do so. In defence of her time though, words like ‘ejaculate’, meaning ‘exclaim’ were common and there’s no subtext. At school in the 1950s we were encouraged to use as wide a range of ways as possible of writing ‘he/she said’. That was just one of them.

    Liked by 1 person

    • It’s interesting to note the changing styles. Now, everyone is encouraged to use fewer adjectives! When I was doing an editing course a couple of years ago, all of the instruction was to discourage author’s from using anything other than he/she said as it was deemed invisible, in that, most readers don’t notice it until you start putting something different. As was the case here, with Ms Christie!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Hi Theresa, interesting review. I have read a few Christie’s, but not this one and I can’t remember having come across anything offensive. It is surprising given the date of original publication, or maybe she was reflecting attitudes aroused by the civil unrest of the time. It would be interesting to read some other titles and see if there is a difference. Perhaps Christie is one of those examples where contemporary screen adaptations are better than the actual books, those kind of attitudes can be written out. I always enjoy watching David Suchet as Poirot, he does such a great job.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s